Mojosmusings
12.20.2005
  The problem with organized labor... So we're having a transit strike here in NYC. New Yorkers who don't work for the city are overwhelmingly freelancers and service employees, so they're less than sympathetic with the union's demand for 8% annual raises and full retirement benefits at 55 instead of 62.

The problem with organized labor is that it fights for its own piece of the pie rather than for everyone. By attempting to continue to hold employers responsible for health and retirement benefits (as well as seniority-based raises), unions are burdening old-line, uncompetitive industries. Worse, though, they are fracturing the working class and letting the government off the hook in the area of social justice.

Why should transit workers have pensions, but not retail clerks or waiters? And also, why should corporate enterprises enter into life-long paternalistic relationships with individuals just because they want to buy some services?

Organized labor should focus what's left of its clout on government (local, state, and federal) to enforce minimum wage laws and build a taxpayer-sponsored social safety net for all, not just for their members. And corporations should be lobbying government just as hard to get social insurance off their books and onto the government's. 
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home
Too silly for Fusilli

ARCHIVES
January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / March 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / September 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / November 2009 / February 2012 /


Powered by Blogger